The chart illustrates shifts in the number of tonnes of CO2 released per capita in four nations: the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Overall, it is apparent that while the British and the Swedish tend to emit less and less co2, the opposite trend was true in the rest. In addition, the number of emissions in the United Kingdom dominated throughout the period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, the year 1967 was seen nearly 11 tonnes Co2 per person in the UK, followed by Sweden, at 9 tonnes. The figure for tonnes per capita in Italy and Portugal was 4 tonnes and more than 1 ton respectively. Afterward, there was a continuous decrease in the UK and stood at around 9 tonnes per person in 2007.
The tonnes in Sweden increased sharply to 10 tonnes in 1977 but later declined enormously by 4 tonnes in 2007. There was a dramatic jump in Italy, from 4 tonnes to approximately 8 tonnes in 2007, surpassing Sweden at the end of the year 1987. Like the Swedish, the Portuguese produced the same tonnes of Co2 in 2007.
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
- The chart below shows rite expenditure on three categories with different proportions among residents in the UK in 2004 11
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53439153439 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52317163858 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.4318149192 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167785992734 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831911451434 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456624237441 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115014105654 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514420886914 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.