The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates the amount of carbon dioxide per capita in four different countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen from the chart that there was an increase in the number of CO2 each person in Italy and Portugal while the UK and Sweden witnessed an opposite trend. The British were responsible for the largest amount of CO2 all the time.
In 1967, the UK and Sweden comprised nearly 11(MT) and 9(MT) respitively, followed by a downward trend. The former declined by around 2(MT) and the later went down considerably, prior to going up to around 10(MT) over first 10 years. Both two countries are counscious, especially Sweden, to curb CO2 due to the serious consequences.
While each Italian emitted about 4(MT), the quantity of CO2 in Portugal was more than 1(MT) in 1967. There was an upward trend in both lands with less than 8(MT) and 6(MT) respectively in 1997, being on a plataeu a duration of ten years. Throughout 40 years, the volume of CO2 emissions in Portugal was the smallest among four European areas.
- The global demand for oil and gas is increasing Some believe that we should therefore encourage the exploitation of remote areas Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 98
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 Given is a bar chart illustrating the income per year for doctors and other employees in seven different nations in 2004 Overall a more d 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 51
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 100
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he largest amount of CO2 all the time. In 1967, the UK and Sweden comprised nea...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74585635359 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55478120258 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646408839779 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0313032987 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172255061407 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685726802165 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053640693935 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108430684109 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458662613353 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.