The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart gives information about how much carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted in 4 countries, namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that these emissions saw a downward trend in United Kingdom and Sweden while it the opposite was true that it rose slightly in Portugal and Italy.
First, these emissions had a decline in the UK and Sweden. In United Kingdom, it was approximately 11%. An unchanged remain was seen in the next 10 years. It had a minimal decrease from 1977 to 2007. In 2007, it went down about 8%. Sweden had witnessed a sharp rise in 1977. In 1977, it was in the highest point, above 10%. Then it fell sharply until 1987. A steady fall was seen until 2007, about two times less than in the year 1977.
Second, on the another countries including Portugal and Italy rose slightly through every 10 years. In Portugal, started at 1.5% in 1967, it saw a minimal increase through 20 years. It went up remarkably until 1997. After that, the figures for these CO2 emissions remain unchanged. In 2007, it could be 5.5%. In Italy, a sharp climb to 6% from 1967 to the next decade. Then a gradual growth in 30 years until 1997. It remained stable when it showed the last data in 2007. In 2007, it was nearly 8%, which was two times as high as when it was in 1967.
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show two cutting tools made from stone They are from an early period and a later period of human history The tools were made by breaking off small pieces of stone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4693877551 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24762728334 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54693877551 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3781665393 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 54.75 112.824112599 49% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.25 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.09268292683 342% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209516088657 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586488898578 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711329817367 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162257368378 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997175743067 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 13.2329268293 43% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 93.14 61.2550243902 152% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 3.3 10.3012195122 32% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.76 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.