The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph below gives information about the average how much carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted in 4 countries, namely United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, it could be seen that these emissions in metric tones saw a downward trend in Sweden and United Kingdom while the amount of CO2 rose in each years in Italy and Portugal.
Firstly, the amount of CO2 at United Kingdom in 1967 was above 11%. It stayed unchanged between 1967 and 1977. Then it steadily fell in each 10 years. In 2007, it declined about 8.5%, compared to 11% in 1967. In Sweden, it had a fluctuation from 1967 to the year 1987. The amount of CO2 in Sweden reached the highest point in 1977, about 10%. After that, there was an insignificant decrease about 5% in 1977 to 2007.
Secondly, these CO2 emissions rose in Italy and Portugal. In Italy, there was approximately 4% in 1967 then it had a dramatical increase in 1977. It witnessed a slight growth between 1977 and 1997. Then it stayed unchanged from 10 years started at 1967. In Portugal, these emissions was about 1.5% in 1967. It climbed steadily between 1967 and 1987. It compared a sharp increase at 1997 when it reached approximately 5%, that was four times as high as in 1967. In 2007, it was in stable when there had no change between 1997 and 2007.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Given high unemployment rate it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education What do you think 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below gives information about the avera...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1081.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58050847458 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40452194774 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478813559322 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8181044031 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.5882352941 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8823529412 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271215981343 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922796922376 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832589205915 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20328237023 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105019566945 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.69 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.