The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given line graph gives the information about the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per head in 3 countries namely the United Kingdom, Sweden, and Italy over the period of 40 years, from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, as can be seen from the graph, the United Kingdom and Sweden witnessed downward trends while the opposite trend was true for Italy and Portugal. Another striking point is that the United Kingdom always took the highest place over the period of time.
To be more specific, the figure for CO2 in the United Kingdom in 1967 was approximately 11 tonnes, with a subsequent slight fall to 10 tonnes in 1987 and a final drop to 9 tonnes in 2007. Similarly, that in Sweden started at 9 tonnes at the beginning, after which it experienced a moderate fluctuation between 7 and 11 to 7 tonnes after 20 years, before reaching roughly 5 tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, in terms of the remaining countries namely Italy and Portugal, both two countries saw upward trends. In 1967, the rate of CO2 in Portugal starting at 1 tonnes, the lowest point of the graph, climbed constantly and dramatically to about 5 tonnes in 2007 after a significant growth to 3 tonnes in 1967. Likewise, the amount of CO2 in Italy was at roughly 4 tonnes in 1967, followed by a considerable rise to 7 tonnes in the following 20 years, and a final increase to nearly 8 tonnes in the final year of the period.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- People only work hard for money and there are no other reasons for doing that To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... always took the highest place over the period of time. To be more specific, the figure for C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1142.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58634538153 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59402934489 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3746130012 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.75 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.125 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312459098594 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14020139144 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120392577609 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215739704056 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128220189107 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.