The given line graph well compares how carbon dioxide (CO2) was emitted in metric tonnes in the following countries: England, Sweden, Portugal and Italy, within half of a century, from 1967 to 2007. Overall, there are three main trends that can be clearly seen in this graph: upward, downward and unstable.
In details, the average carbon dioxide emissions data of the United Kingdom had the highest starting point, with over 10 metric tonnes in 1967, before falling down gradually to approximately 8.5 metric tonnes at the end. For Sweden, the amount of emission gas had a sharply increase from over 8 to 10 metric tonnes in the first decade. It then reduced dramatically to 7 metric tonnes in the following 10 years and continue going down slowly to the end of the period. Meanwhile, both Italy and Portugal had an upward trend in receiving carbon dioxide in the first four decades, with nearly 8 metric tonnes for Italy and 5 metric tonnes for Portugal, before remaining unchanged until final time.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland, New Zealand. 83
- Because of the busy pace of modern life, many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world. Discuss the effects lack of experience with and understanding of nature can have on children as they grow up. 89
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... Sweden, the amount of emission gas had a sharply increase from over 8 to 10 metric tonnes in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40147734231 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8255289318 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168588317245 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848268853367 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588728873271 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145423094966 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332626121205 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.