The line graph illustrates average CO2emissions per person in 4 different countries namely UK, Sweden, Italy, Portugal over a 40 year period commencing from 1967 to 2007. Overall, average CO2 emission for Italy and Portugal increased, while that of the UK and Sweden decreased gradually.
Firstly, Italy and Portugal followed a similar trend in CO2 emission on average per person with just above 1.5 and 4 metric tonnes respectively. Furthermore, this trend increased steadily and landed at slightly below 8 and 6 metric tonnes. Secondly, the united kingdom and Portugal co2 emissions decreased over the period of time.
Average Co2 emission was highest in the UK in 1967 with nearly 11 metric tonnes while this figure decreased gradually and reached 8.5 metric tonnes. Sweden started at approximately 9 metric tonnes in 1967 and increased dramatically in the first decade and reached 11 metric tonnes but this numbers fell drastically in the next decade from 1977 to 1987 with 6 metric tonnes in 1987 and decreased further and landed at 5 metric tonnes by 2007.
- Some people say international sports events help in world peace.Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people say international sports events help in world peace Do you agree or disagree 63
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Science tells us about the activities which are good for our health and others which are bad. Millions of people all over the world know this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is and what can be done to change it. 61
- schools are spending more time teaching traditional subjects such as history. Some people think they should rather spend more time in teaching skills that can help students find a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rtugal co2 emissions decreased over the period of time. Average Co2 emission was highest in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14367816092 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71367236486 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8007101234 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210400970289 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12513695171 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680519731641 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174798447075 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812697036327 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.