The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese between 1976 and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese between 1976 and 2007

The line graph compares average carbon dioxide breathed out by one person in four European countries over a period of four decades. The unit of measure is in metric tonnes. Overall, it is noticeable that both citizen from united kingdom and Sweden who initially had highest emission of carbon dioxide witnessed a decline whereas Italian and Portuguese who had lowest emission of carbon dioxide experienced an increase over the period shown.
In 1967, the average of carbon dioxide breathed out by united kingdom citizen stood at approximately 11metric tonnes. The figure that declined steadily to 10 metric tonnes after 20 years. Above 4 and 8 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide was emitted by Italian and Swedese. However, Portuguese was just under 2 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide breathed out by one person.

Emission of carbon dioxide from Portuguese and Italian saw a steady increase to reach below 6 metric tonnes and 8 metric tonnes respectively in 1979 and remained stable for the rest of the period shown. Emission from swedenese that initially peaked at above 10 metric tonnes experienced a sharp decline to the same point with Portuguese peak (below 6 metric tonnes). From 1987 to 2007, emission of carbon dioxide person from united kingdom witnessed a plug to just above 8 metric tonnes. In 1987,average emission of carbon dioxide from Italian overtook that of his counterpart from Sweden.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-23 Dele Omo 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...united kingdom and Sweden who initially had highest emission of carbon dioxide witnessed a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...line whereas Italian and Portuguese who had lowest emission of carbon dioxide experienced ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... breathed out by one person. Emission of carbon dioxide from Portuguese and It...
^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tonnes respectively in 1979 and remained stable for the rest of the period shown....
^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he period shown. Emission from swedenese that initially peaked at above 10 metric...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12227074236 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56435633614 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449781659389 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4947420987 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322935043863 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142662793482 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738408953806 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244193002331 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424995762062 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.