The line graphs compares the UK, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in terms of the amount of carbon dioxide emissed by each individual from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the amount of CO2 emissions per person in the UK and Sweden decreased but not worth considering, while that of Italy and Portugal increased slightly in most of the years given.
It is clear that the amount of CO2 emissed by people living in Portugal stood at about 1.5 metric tonnes, which was the least figure in 1967. Over the 40-year period, the figure for Portugal rose gradually and reached the peak at 5.5 metric tonnes. Likewise, the amount of CO2 used in Italy by per person began at over 4 metric tonnes, which was increased and doubled its beginning, at nearly 8.
Whereas, people living in the UK emissed CO2 was the highest in four different countries in 1967, at roughly 11 metric tonnes. The UK witnessed a slightly increase in the amount of CO2 emissions by around 2 metric tonnes in 2007. The figure for Sweden stood at nearly 9. Although it rose slightly in 1977, the amount of CO2 emissions fell slowly at approximately 5.5 in 2007
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: gabitkar
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...tugal increased slightly in most of the years given. It is clear that the amount of ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ghly 11 metric tonnes. The UK witnessed a slightly increase in the amount of CO2 emissions by aroun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6345177665 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39406706528 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3521692853 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170906264262 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898836346916 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724143396329 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147711468802 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769226117909 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.