the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The chart illustrates how much carbon dioxide was a released by one person on the average from 1967 to 2007 in four nations, namely the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese.
Overall, while the United Kingdom and Sweden registered downward trends, two remaining countries witnessed the opposite. During the 40-year interval, the United Kingdom ranked first as the top co2 manufacterer.
In 1967, standing at over 10 matric tonnes, the amount of emissions released by the UK was the highest of all the countries. Following this was the figure for Sweden, at more than 8 tonnes, double the figure for Italy. Moreover, Portuguese was at a bottom of the list, as the nation produced a minor number, only two tons, of pollutants.
From 1967 to 1977, the United Kingdom lowered their amount of CO2 released, decreasing by one-tenth of a tonne, although the three counterparts raised their amount of CO2, around 2 tonnes each.
After that, Italy and Portuguese continued releasing more pollutants, with the figures increasing by nearly 2 tonnes and 4 tonnes respectively, making the Italy overtake Sweden's position in 1987. Conversely, the amount of emissions recorded in Sweden dramatically dropped to 7 tons, and then slightly decreased to under 6 tons at the end of the statistic period. The same trend, but a smaller gap was seen in the UK, as the amount declined to nearly 9 tons in 2007.
- The diagram below shows how oil is extracted in the production of perfume Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy Portugal between 1967 and 2007 89
- The graph and chart below give information about migration to the UK The graph below shows how long immigrants in the year 2000 2008 intended to stay in the UK And the pie chart shows reasons for migration in 2008 73
- The plan below show a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- he charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99137931034 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74127087185 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.358832099 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212558207269 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772938955741 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590030206487 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117636443756 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626999075579 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99137931034 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74127087185 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603448275862 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.358832099 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212558207269 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772938955741 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590030206487 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117636443756 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626999075579 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.