The given line graph compares the average of daily expenditure which spent by three groups of New Zealand visitors between 1997 and 2017.
Overall, New Zealand travelers spent the highest amount of daily expenses from 1997 to 20015. Moreover, visitors who saw their friends and relatives spent the least amount of money over the given period.
At first, in 1997, business travelers daily cost was about 250$ that rose to nearly 330$ in 2002 which was the maximum reported number. Afterwards, it decreased dramatically by 150$ in 2005 and it had a period of fluctuation over the next 12 years.
It is noteworthy that friends or relative visitors spent nearly 110$ in 1997 which was the minimum amount of spending from 1997 to 2017. Both of the vacation and friends or relatives figures had an upward trend over the following 7 years. Unlike the business figure, they had a steady decline in 2005 which was followed by a constantly changes.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$250'.
Suggestion: $250
...business travelers daily cost was about 250$ that rose to nearly 330$ in 2002 which ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$330'.
Suggestion: $330
...cost was about 250$ that rose to nearly 330$ in 2002 which was the maximum reported ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$150'.
Suggestion: $150
...fterwards, it decreased dramatically by 150$ in 2005 and it had a period of fluctuat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$110'.
Suggestion: $110
...iends or relative visitors spent nearly 110$ in 1997 which was the minimum amount of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43721152139 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.363068172 43.030603864 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262325445691 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119113156051 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13880004492 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183003721886 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130106853866 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.