the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.
writing a report.
The bar chart highlights the information about the average annual gross domestic product growth in term of 3 types of countries: developed countries, developing countries adopting a global approach to business or globalizers and developing countries adopting a non-global approach to business or non-globalizers from the 1960s to the1990s.
Overall, It can be observed that there was a gradual downward trend in the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries. And that of globalizers followed a contrasting trend.
If we look at the average annual gross domestic product growth of wealthy countries, it started at just over 4.5%, which meant that it was the highest percent among 3 types of countries. After that, the figure fell down steadily to nearly 3.0% in the 1970s and continuously decreased by approximately 1.0% in the 1990s. By contrast, the average domestic product growth of globalizers began at the lowest position compared with 2 remaining types of countries, at around 15% in the 1960s. But in the last three periods of time, the figure increased significantly and reached a high of nearly 5.0% in the 1990s.
As regards non-globalizers, there was a slight increase in the first two periods of time, from nearly 2.5% in the 1960s to just over 3.0% in the 1970s. Following this the figure dropped considerably, making it slightly lower than the others, nearly 1.0% in the 1980s and around 1.5% in the 1990s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-14 | Ben.Afshar | 75 | view |
| 2021-03-06 | Nurimov Elyor | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-18 | Lien Huynh | 80 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-02 | myname95 | view |
- the graph and table show info about water use worldwide and water consumption in 2 countries. 73
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- The charts below show the level of participation in education and science in developing countries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 61
- the graph shows the oil production capacity in 6 countries between 1990 and 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12340425532 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94108746437 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51914893617 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7244079122 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.777777778 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291211385908 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103630315831 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118240457639 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177016499775 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127552636463 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.