The graph below shows the average house prices in three countries between the year 1997-2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph give information about the average house price in three countries from 1997 to 2014.
According to the line graph, during the period in country A the average house prices in 2002 and 2014 dramatically increased while country B and country C in 2008 saw significant decline. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the line graph, the average house prices in 1997 received about 150 dollars and by country C and B in 2008 approximately 50 dollars and 240 dollars. Meanwhile, the average house prices of Country A (2008) significantly increased when from 100 dollars to 450 dollars. By contrast, country A and country C significant increased when from 150 dollars to 300 dollars ( Country B) and 150 dollars to 160 dollars ( Country C). During the following quarter, country C is lowest among three countries.
Look at the line graph in 2014, the average house prices in country C demonstrate a relatively lower expenditure behaviors with on significant 240 dollars. As number advances, there is a perceptible increase in beverage expenses. Notably, those house prices between country A and country B exhibit a discernible an version to hospitality-related expenses, insted opting to allowed 600 dollars and 450 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
- Major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems What are the problems that young people living in those cities are facing Suggest some solutions 73
- The diagrams below shows how oil is expected in use of production of perfume Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025 73
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...ine graph, during the period in country A the average house prices in 2002 and 2014 d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed when from 150 dollars to 300 dollars Country B and 150 dollars to 160 dollars...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Country B and 150 dollars to 160 dollars Country C. During the following quarter,...
^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...y A and country B exhibit a discernible an version to hospitality-related expenses...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05797101449 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00388322505 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1397828971 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.7 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264057764384 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134319818906 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103827337181 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221238493157 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871759016426 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.