The line chart given represents average monthly change in the prices of three elements namely, zinc, copper and nickel over the year 2014.
The percentage change depicted in the graph is compared with change in previous month. In the month of January, nickel had the highest increase in price in comparison with zinc and copper. Zinc had only 1% change which was the lowest of all the three metals. In the month of February, there was an inclination in price of zinc only. Overall, there was a drop in the prices of all metals after February till June. But, there was a surge in average monthly change in the prices for rest of the year.
During the month of December, nickel recorded the least monthly change in price. On the other hand, zinc recorded the highest monthly change with a rate of 2%. During the month of June, the prices of three metals witnessed a drastic drop. From the graph, we can clearly see that percentage change in prices remained constant for all the three metals during the months of July, August and September.
It is evident that all metals had a drastic change in prices as compared to previous month over the year 2014.
- Because of television and worldwide computer connections people can now become familiar with a great many places that they have never visited As a result tourism will soon become obsolete 50
- The graphs below show the post school qualifications held by Canadians in the age groups 25 to 35 and 45 to 55 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The following appeared in a note from a sedan owner to a friend Of the two top brands of cars introduced in past year Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 50 kms p 60
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2002 20 and future projections for 2025 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65365853659 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18352492147 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.809383722 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317969634264 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14788665161 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563813542933 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22097290959 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443812025781 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.