The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 to 2030.

The given line chart shows the information about the number of UK commuters travelling daily by car, bus and train from 1970 with prediction to 2030.
Overall, what stands out from the chart is that there was an upward trend in the amount of car and train, whereas that of bus dropped slightly.
Looking for the details, one of the first things to note is that the number of UK commuters travelling each day by three transportation remained stable from 1970 to 1980. The data of train and car went up rapidly by 3 and 8 million respectively, whereas that of bus dropped steadily to 3,5 million, accounting for 0,5 million from 1980 to 2000. The amount of UK commuters travelling daily by train rose sharply to 5 million followed by a slight decrease of bus from 5 to 3 million between 2010 and 2020
From 2020 to 2030, predictions reveal that the figures for car and train will jump to 9 and 5 million respectively/in order, to contary that the number of UK commuters travelling per day by bus is expected to reduce slightly by 3 million.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-20 ngoc.tuyen 73 view
2021-11-20 ngoc.tuyen 73 view
2021-10-02 ngoc.tuyen 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowed by a slight decrease of bus from 5 to 3 million between 2010 and 2020 Fr...
^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght decrease of bus from 5 to 3 million between 2010 and 2020 From 2020 to 203...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 5 to 3 million between 2010 and 2020 From 2020 to 2030, predictions reveal th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55319148936 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66276404485 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.1946500585 43.030603864 226% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.2 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.6 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395555402962 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226168982738 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121543778021 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263700206213 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108221119856 0.0819641961636 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.