The given graph illustrates information about how many Vietnamese students studied in three countries namely France, Russia and America over a period of 5 years starting from 2000.
In general, it is clear that the number of Vietnamese pupils enrolling in American and French schools increased substantially, as opposed to a marginal upward trend in Russian schools.
In 2000, the number of Vietnamese students learning in France was the largest with over 3.5 million, compared with nearly 3 million and 1.5 million students studying in Russia and America respectively. Over the following five years, the number of Vietnamese students studying abroad in France and Russia decreased by 1 million, whereas that in America saw a rise of 2 million students.
From 2005 onwards, the figure for America rose dramatically to 5 million students in 2015. Similarly, the number of Vietnamese students in French schools remained unchanged at approximately 2.5 million until 2010, before increasing by over 2 million in 2015. Meanwhile, although decreasing to the lowest point of under 2 million students in 2010, the illustration for Russia then rose gradually to 2.5 million at the end of the period.
- Many parents complain that computer games have no value to their children s studies On the contrary those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental and physical development What is your opinion 89
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 73
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visitng a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30526315789 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89088739264 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5078425179 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334656923189 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17253873749 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858957500924 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199423409074 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936117870744 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.