The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories
The line graph illustrates the average time to manufacture cars of four different companies in the USA from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that the number of hours taken by those companies to produce a car decreased over the period shown. However, the amount of time was reduced by General Motor was higher than that of the others.
In 1998, General Motors needed 32 hours to produce a car. The production time of Ford was 4 hours lower than this, while the figures for Toyota and Honda were similar at approximately 22 hours per vehicle. Following the period, the trends fluctuated for most of the companies, although the figures decreased for all firms.
After reaching a peak of around 31 hours in 2001, the number of hours needed to build a vehicle of Ford fell by about 10 hours to 21 hours in 2005, being lower than the figure of exactly 22 hours of General Motor. In the same year, 20 hours was the amount of time that both Toyota and Honda spent to make a four-wheel drive.
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 80
- The charts below give information about the people use public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 in 2000 49
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ower than the figure of exactly 22 hours of General Motor. In the same year, 20 h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54444444444 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32713462343 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561111111111 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4247495573 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160779331454 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837949456268 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770654324119 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12234657939 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08173673538 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.