The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories
The line graph illustrates the average amount of time spent by four different companies in the USA on the production of a car from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that the number of hours taken by those companies to produce a vehicle decreased over the period shown. However, General Motor reduced the production time by more hours than the other three manufacturers
In 1998, General Motors took 32 hours to produce a car. The production time of Ford was 4 hours lower than this, while the figures for Toyota and Honda were similar at approximately 22 hours per vehicle. In the following years, production times fluctuated for most of the companies, although all figures generally decreased.
After reaching a peak of around 31 hours in 2001, the number of hours taken to build a vehicle of Ford fell by about 10 hours to 21 hours in 2005. The figures for the other companies also decreased by 2005. The time of manufacture declined steadily over the period to 22 hours in the case of General Motor. However, in the case of Toyota and Honda, there was a slight reduction in the average production time per car, so that each company produced an automobile in 20 hours in 2005.
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 67
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Why are these changes happening Do you think these changes are positive and negative 89
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles at their US factories 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7033492823 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56061785715 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8084602157 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182174787526 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853342711276 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679842603669 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138383999459 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060397506959 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.