The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The line graph compares the amount of time <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">averagely</span> spent to produce a car by 4 companies at their factories in the USA between 1998 and 2005.
Overall, the number of hours used to produce a car decreased in each company over the shown period. Honda and Toyota remained the most productive manufactures, and General experienced the most dramatic decline in production time.
In 1998, Toyota and Honda had the same starting figure, at 22 hours per vehicle. The figures for Ford and general were much higher, at 28 and 32 hours respectively. over the next year, general and Honda reduced their production time by 2 hours. In contrast, the figures for ford and Toyota rose slightly by 1 hour.
With the exception of general, the average number of hours spent by the other 3 companies increased, reaching their peak at 29 hours in 2001 by ford and 24 hours per vehicle by Toyota and Honda. The production rate of general continued to decrease substantially by 8 hours, reaching 22 hours in 2005. In the same year, only 20 hours were spent to produce a car by Toyota and Honda, compared to 21 hours of Ford.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-13 | hong02082002 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | hoathubanh | 67 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | Minh Pham | 73 | view |
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st dramatic decline in production time. In 1998, Toyota and Honda had the same s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...igher, at 28 and 32 hours respectively. over the next year, general and Honda reduce...
^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: Except; Except for
...d Toyota rose slightly by 1 hour. With the exception of general, the average number of hours sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38106323712 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2592186707 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186329254752 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762525897433 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068778055035 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129219205116 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667998796348 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.