The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by chienese people between 1985 and 2010.
The multi line graph illustrates the changes in different three foods which consumed by China from 1985 to 2010.The data calibrated in grams.
Have a look on the consumption of meat, 100 grams food was consuming a person in a week whereas, there was significant rise could be noticed in the following years. Moreover, the second place was salt which was used near around 500 grams in initial year however, with the passage of time it gradually declined. Both former and later were stagnant on 200 grams per person in 2010.
By having a glance on another food, fish was popular and it showed some fluctuations.Afterwards, 700 grams food was taken by single person in 1990 while, it was slight fell before inclining about 100 grams in . the first year.The demand of was decrease in 1995 on the other hand, it continously upsurged to till 10 years and touched the peak point about 900 grams in final year.
Overall, the most of the changes observed in fish food as compare to the others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
- The Charts below show the popularity of different political parties in a country before and after the general election The election won by the Conservative party and they formed a government with the liberal Democrats 77
- Some people say that cars should be banned from the centres of city Do you agree or disagree 80
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 73
- There are more new tons being built now a days. It is important to inclined public park and sports facilities than shopping centre for individuals to spend their free time. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 22
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ich consumed by China from 1985 to 2010.The data calibrated in grams. Have a look...
^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterwards
...popular and it showed some fluctuations.Afterwards, 700 grams food was taken by single per...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...fell before inclining about 100 grams in . the first year.The demand of was decrea...
^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...l before inclining about 100 grams in . the first year.The demand of was decrease i...
^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ing about 100 grams in . the first year.The demand of was decrease in 1995 on the o...
^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in fish food as compare to the others.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70520231214 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71427478722 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3086362995 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 5.23603664747 221% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152237129126 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773872352352 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706664845003 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113856314403 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665000532676 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.