With a fast pace of modern life more and more people towards fast food for their main meals.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
In this highly sophisticated scenario, most of the people moving turn around the junk food and recommended to this such as major food.I believe that there are many drawbacks consider behind the growth of this food as compare to the benefits.
There are multifarious demerits which can clearly be seen if people do highly recommend to junk food. Firstly, obesity is the main reason because people are eating food in a large amount and this food not easily digest.People become overweight as well as the great deal of diseases are come in their life like a high blood pressure and fatigue ectera.
To be more precise, the trend of the home cooking food would be declined. Since every one gives lot of preference which food is made by the help of large quantities of oil as well as different types of recipes. Sometimes women do ignore to making meal at home however, just give a order and supplied the dishes at their house.
On the other hand, having a something which help to describe merits of this. First of all, fast foods are very tasty rather than the home made foods. As we made food as a simple way and use less ingredients while, if people say obout the restarurent food is mind blowing because it ready for the various techniques and well talented cooks therefore, this food is obviously tastefully.
In crux, it can not be neglected the more bad results of this food for the human being whereas, fast food is invaluable in some conditions.
- The graph below shows population figure for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 78
- The Chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 56
- There are more new towns being built now a days It is important to include public park and sports facilities than shopping centre for individuals to spend their free time To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- The Charts summarise the weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 71
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S from 1960 to 2011. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
... recommended to this such as major food.I believe that there are many drawbacks c...
^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
... amount and this food not easily digest.People become overweight as well as the great ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... making meal at home however, just give a order and supplied the dishes at their ...
^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun ingredients is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...As we made food as a simple way and use less ingredients while, if people say obout ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 283, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'readies'?
Suggestion: readies
...arurent food is mind blowing because it ready for the various techniques and well tal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...results of this food for the human being whereas, fast food is invaluable in some...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65758754864 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46227574801 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9353369021 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.7 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216126643616 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854911689865 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505895607861 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124680726189 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041378674737 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.