The bart graph provides information about the population of Asian elephants since 1997 till 2004 in nine Asian countries.
In a deeper analyses, we can see a threefold decline of the number of elephants in Malaysia and Thailand with about 3 thousand in Malaysia and 3,5 thousand in Thailand in 1997 and approximately 1 thousand in 2004. Also, China where the amounts of elephants was estimated as low as thousand animal, it had declined twice in 7-year period.
To sum up, although the overall trend appeared to be downward, the only country where the population of Asian elephants showed the sides of recovering.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: tamdo1695
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this notion 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 56
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 281, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ts of elephants was estimated as low as thousand animal, it had declined twice in 7-year...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 513.0 965.302439024 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 103.0 196.424390244 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98058252427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.18573250055 3.73543355544 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8071519019 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 65.0 106.607317073 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631067961165 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 155.7 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1618083521 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173170929005 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998882177379 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535842222618 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121912940651 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447877026459 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.