The graph below shows the changes in the maximum number of Asian elephants between 1994 and 2004.
The bar chart reveals the camparsion information about elephants popualtion between 1994 and 2007 in the Asia.
Overall, the numer of elephants had decreased in all the Asian countries instead of china and Combodia. India had carried maximum number of elephants however it also had seen significant decreased in the elephants popualtion.
In 1997, India and Myanmar were leading countries in Asia around 10000 and 5000 respectively and India had seen decrease almost 2500 while in Myanmar the population decreased near to negligible from 1997 to 2004. Malaysia and thailand had decresed the number of elephant more half in comparison of 1997. in Sri Lanka the number of elephants was more 2500 through the period and seen small derease moreover Vietnam has the 50% of Sir Lanka. Laos was only a countri with stable number population.
In china, the number of elephant in 1997 was 500 and it increased around 1000 elephant over the time while Cambodia had seen minmum increase over the years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-10-15 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 67 | view |
2021-10-15 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 73 | view |
2021-10-15 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 73 | view |
- The prevention of health problems and health illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extent do you agree 56
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- Few people devote time to hobbies nowadays Say why you think this is the case and what effect this has on the individual and society in general 73
- The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en decrease almost 2500 while in Myanmar the population decreased near to negligi...
^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...phant more half in comparison of 1997. in Sri Lanka the number of elephants was m...
^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'elephant' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'elephants'.
Suggestion: elephants
...97 was 500 and it increased around 1000 elephant over the time while Cambodia had seen m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06707317073 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55052309433 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573170731707 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3783449444 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209168315608 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983833598822 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437146080585 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132856847332 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321506725327 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.