The bar graph illustrates, the variations in internet surfing places during four distinct years from 1998 to 2004. The places include home, library, work, and college. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, the overwhelming majority of people used the home for accessing the internet, and minimal people used the library for surfing in the four given years.
In 1998, around 55% of people used the internet from home which is the same percentage as 2004. Similarly, approximately 28% of people surf the internet in the workplace in 1998, compared to 2004 which is 10% higher with 18%. Internet usage from college and library was only 20% and 12% respectively at the beginning which is below 20% at the end of the given period.
Regarding 2000 and 2002 show comparatively lower use of internet in the home. whereas, surfing of the internet in colleges was about 25% which stands for the first place in the given years. Likewise, about 30% of people choose to surf the internet in the workplace in 2002 which is around 18% in 2000.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try an d improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location 72
- The table below shows the production of carbon d Nkioxide in five different countries in 2006 67
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge. Units are measured in percentage. Overall, the overwhelming majority of pe...
^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same percentage as 2004. Similarly, approximately 28% of people surf the int...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...college and library was only 20% and 12% respectively at the beginning which is b...
^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...vely lower use of internet in the home. whereas, surfing of the internet in colleges wa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, likewise, regarding, similarly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9209039548 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.545534757 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2456708894 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278862869928 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120053784035 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704279675334 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176819371927 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289170235778 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.