The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008.
Illustrated in the line graph was how UK fertility rate of women altered in 6 distinct age groups between 1973 and 2008.
All in all, the highest figures throughout the time frame belonged to women aged 25-29. While the birth rate of females aged 35-39 and those of under 20 age exchanged their positions since 1995, the others hung on to their original positions towards the end.
To put it specifically, women in age group ranging from 25 to 29 accounted for the highest percentages, which followed a downward oscillation and bottomed at nearly 60% in 1988. In contrast, the UK witnessed a mild decline in the figures for senior females, which did not exceed 10%, making them the smallest birth rates as registered.
While the rate of women whose ages were under 20 fell slightly, the females in 35-39 age group had the proportions moving onwards to surpass the former in 1985, ranking fourth in the graph. Similarly, the rate of birth of those aged 20-25 and 30-35 had opposite tendencies but remained stable at around 48% and 42% respectively in the last 5 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | phadode | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | czefw13 | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | lynnnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Ha Chi Nguyen | view | |
| 2021-09-07 | Ha Chi Nguyen | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Illustrated in the line graph was how UK...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t age groups between 1973 and 2008. All in all, the highest figures througho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... original positions towards the end. To put it specifically, women in age gro...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... smallest birth rates as registered. While the rate of women whose ages were ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5368426412 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629032258065 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.999690784 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337204152143 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153501234378 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932233747127 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216230135176 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897392039404 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.