The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993
and 2012.
The line graph below compares the jobless proportion in London and the rest of England in the young adult in the period from 1993 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage unemployed of the group aged 16-24 always higher than overall the rest of England and fluctuate continuously through 19 years. London always has a higher proportion than the rest of England.
In the group 16-24 years old, there was a gradual decline in unemployment rates from 22% and 18% in 1993 to 15% and just above 10% in 2002, in London and the rest of England, respectively. In the next 10 years, the percentage unemployed in this group in London rise dramatically from 15% in 2002 to reach a peak of 25% in 2012. The proportion of group aged 16-24 in the rest of England also have a similar morphed but is lower nearly 5% than the group of London in 2012.
It is clear that the percentage unemployment of overall England includes London to decrease over the period. Overall London, there was a sharp drop in proportion unemployed from 14% in 1993 to nearly 8% in 2000, and stay the around the same this figure to 2008, before rising again at just below 10% in 2012. Over 12 years, the percentage of the rest of England also slightly reduced from 10% in 1993 to 8% at the end of the period.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
- The graph below shows difference sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. 61
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 61
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 56
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below compares the jobless proportion i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecrease over the period. Overall London, there was a sharp drop in proportion une...
^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on unemployed from 14% in 1993 to nearly 8% in 2000, and stay the around the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47659574468 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44204902499 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425531914894 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4417839478 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196120945114 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100675958024 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700464132029 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151363415703 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822718661245 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.