the graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK (expressed in percentage terms). Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons when relevent
The line graph demonstrates the change in the paradigm of access to high-technology at residents' houses in the UK over the period of 14 years.
It can be clearly seen that there was an increasing trend for all domestic access. Moreover, the figure for the CD player which was the most accessed lost the number and gave the rank to the DVD player.
Between 1994 and 1997, there was a slight rise in CD players, at 15%. Throughout the remainder of the period, CD players witnessed a moderate increase. However, from 2006 to 2008 CD players declined slightly. Also, from 1998 to 2008 the figure for the Internet experienced gradual growth.
In the same period, the figure for Mobile phones and DVDs seems to increase more noticeably than others. From 1999 to 2001, there was a significant in Internet access, between 15 and 30 percent. There was also a slightly increased rate at bout 80% in 2008. Furthermore, from 2003 until 2005, the DVD line saw a dramatic go up, at almost 50%. Throughout the remainder of the period, the number of DVD players in 2008 is more than 80%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68947368421 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57566386031 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584210526316 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.1641185649 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.25 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0522947631685 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0202091468312 0.103423049105 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417582801373 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0503003986439 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060145925021 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.