The provided line graph elucidates the proportion of four different age groups who went to the movie theater at least once a month.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that most film aficionados were from 15-24 years old, compared to the age group over 35 which had the least number of people interested in movies. It is also noticeable that cinema attendance increased significantly over the period.
At the start, about 15% of the 15-24 age group citizens went to the cinema once a month or more, this figure thereafter uptick gradually then reached roughly 45% by 1996. During the same 1984-1996 timescale, similar growths could be observed with regard to the rates of the 25-35 and 35+ groups, with the former risen from 5% in 1984 to 15% in 1996 and the latter went up from 2% (1984) to 5% (1996). Moviegoers aged between 7 and 14 also climbed considerably, albeit erratically, from 10% during 1984 to 20% during 1996.
Between 2006 and the completion of the timeframe, the figure for the 15 to 24 age group went through two years of ups and downs before restarting its upward trend, eventually hit 52% in 2008. The percentages of those aged 7 to 14 and those aged 25 to 35 also fluctuated a lot until touched 30% in 2008. Meanwhile, the proportion of those aged 35 and more progressively grown over time, ultimately reached over 14% in 2008.
- Some people think international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 67
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, then, while, at least, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72614107884 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62405405473 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8058166558 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.555555556 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161837466662 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077252575616 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436857681419 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108176775974 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278821925117 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.