The map below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007.
The two presented maps elucidate the changes of Lynnfield between 1936 and 2007.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the town had been developed considerably over the period with a lot of amenities had been built.
In 1936, the butchers had been constructed at the top right corner of the center of the town, and right next to it was the sweet shop which sited next to the post office. Whereas the location of the sweet shop and the butchers had been replaced to the supermarket during 2007, the post office position still remained stable in the same period. The shopping center has been established right in the center of Lynnfield in 2007 while it was just a vacant lot in 1936. At the bottom of Lynnfield’s center, the bank and the library were still stayed unchanged over the period and the flower shop in 1936 has demolished and then create the travel agent in the same location during 2007.
The town had a total of three trees in the Northwest in 1936 while it just had only one tree in 2007. The cycle path had been vanished and replaced by the road in the Southwest. During 1936, the town just had a river in the Northeast, compared to 2007 when the river location had been constructed to a residential area. The government offices and the farmland had changed into the museum and the golf course respectively over the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, still, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65163934426 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45519853894 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8117974395 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211847011589 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100719573583 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084736927589 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152188334865 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915166150171 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.