The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates changes (variation) in eating three kinds of jams comprising Low fats and reduced spreads, Margarine and Butter over a period of 27 years from 1981 to 2007.
It is clear that while there were downward trends in the usage of Butter and Margarine, the opposite was true for Low fat and reduced spreads over the period shown. It is also notable that the number of spread consuming showed the fastest decrease in terms of Butter.
In 1981, people enjoyed most about butter at 140 grams while only a smaller level at roughly 90 grams of margarine were reported. It was not until 1996 that low fats and reduced spreads was introduced with a small portion at 10 grams. Over the next 20 years from 1981, the consumed butter figure increased a little by nearly 20 grams to peak at 160 in 1986 before falling dramatically by 110 grams in 2007. Meanwhile, a small decline was experienced in the recorded margarine quantity, which hit a low of 80 grams in 1986, but rose later and levelled off at 100 grams during five years to 1996 when the margarine consumption rate dropped again and bottomed out at 40 grams the last year of the period.
By contrast, the period between 1996 and 2001 witnessed a rapid growth to more than 80 grams in the amount of low-fat and reduced spread measurement, which was followed by a slight dip, but still the most favored jam in the final six years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 78
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of 3 spreads from 1981 to 2007. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60557768924 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35506362154 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2664385926 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.5 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.375 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161430162544 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761687258802 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532908530644 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102260376546 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519858264633 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.