The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The given line graph gives information about the weekly consumption of fish and meat in a nation in Europe over a period of 25 years starting from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, as can be seen from the line graph, while an upward trend was seen in the quantity of chicken consumed, the opposite was true for the figure for beef, lamb, and fish. In addition, fish was the food that was eaten least weekly over the given period.
In 1979, the amount of beef consumed per week was the highest, at roughly 220 grams, while the figure for fish was significantly lower, at about 65 grams. At the same time, 150 grams and 140 grams of lamb and chicken were eaten weekly by the Euporean population respectively.
In 2004, the amount of chicken consumed weekly in this European nation rose dramatically by 100 grams to approximately 240 grams and became the highest figure in the chart. Additionally, there was a significant decline to about 110 grams in the figure for beef, while the quantity of fish eaten per week fell slightly to only 40 grams. Meanwhile, the lamb’s figure witnessed a gradual drop to about 60 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 197.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67512690355 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47902900085 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 176.041082164 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532994923858 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 506.74238477 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.923442618 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121040606062 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597729265503 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690650834995 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973746641635 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782276140407 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 78.4519038076 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.