The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in European country from 1979 to 2001.
The line graph shows the consumption of fish and various types of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Overall, chicken have been the dominant type of meat from the beginning year to the end year. Fish have represented a small but significant proportion of total consumption and despite of small consumption it decreases slightly.
Chicken command the continuous increase in consumption at 150 gram per person per week 250 grams from the year 1979 and 2004 respectively. On the other hand, there is a drastic decrease has been manifested in the consumption of beef. It is accounted as 210 grams in 1979 and fluctuated for next 5 years and results in decrease of beef consumption at 120 gram in 2004.
Lamb represented intake of 150 grams and it decreased continuously and in the year 2004, it is speculated the consumption is accounted as 70 grams only. Fish consumption has decreased in year 1979 and after that remain constant at approximately 50 g.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-30 | kashyap sahil | 73 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people What might be this case Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The daigram below shows the stages and equipments used in the process and how cement os used to produce concrete 90
- Fever young people play sports these days Why is this Whatcan be done to encourage more young people to do sports 61
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative trend 73
- The best way to improve health is to do regular exercise To what extended do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ntinuous increase in consumption at 150 gram per person per week 250 grams from the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 354, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... in decrease of beef consumption at 120 gram in 2004. Lamb represented intake of 15...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88484848485 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94863277838 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539393939394 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3362221351 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249210326299 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130407595355 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124156611827 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200830105376 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143037692072 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.