The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph provides information about the amount of four types of food that a person in a European country consumed weekly from 1979 to 2004.
The main consumption of food was beef in 1979, which was roughly 220 grams. It rose and fell during the period of time, and plunged to just over 100 grams by 2004. Lamb was consumed at around 150 grams per week, and chicken was just a little lower at approximately 140 grams. However, the trends went opposite. The former fluctuated and soared to almost 250 grams. On the other hand, the latter ended up at just over 50 grams. The consumption of fish was noticeably consistently the lowest over these 25 years. It was around 60 grams at the beginning of time, and it slightly went up and down to around 45 grams at the end of the period.
To sum up, all the food consumption changed in the period of time, and that of chicken was the only one that increased.
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 56
- People eat more processed food than they did in the past, why is this and what are the effects of this? 61
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. 61
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development. This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside. This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole. What are th 49
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...try consumed weekly from 1979 to 2004. The main consumption of food was beef in 19...
^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... 220 grams. It rose and fell during the period of time, and plunged to just over 100 grams by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 52, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...all the food consumption changed in the period of time, and that of chicken was the only one t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47368421053 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37085255304 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3776289707 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2727272727 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201969509176 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908675292687 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165966757075 0.0843802449381 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211821554012 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224272622143 0.0819641961636 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.35 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.64 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.