The Graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the fish, lamb, beef and chicken intake taken by a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be manifested that beef was consumed by peoples more in starting phase whereas that was replaced by chicken at the end of the survey. While the people who carried seafood such as fish was least throughout the period.
First of all, the fluctuation occurs throughout the period where the beef intake at the starting phase was approximately 200 grams which decreased by about 200 grams in 1981. Afterwards, int increased by 400 grams in the next 2 years then it went down. Comparing to chicken and lamb their initial point was started in 1979 where the formal one was increased at the end and it's the opposite lamb was decreased at 50 grams per person per week in 2004.
Furthermore, meeting points of chicken and beef were in the year 1987 the consumption of both types of meat was nearby 200 grams which cross each other and at the end chicken stand at 250 grams which were last highest consumed meat at 2004 and beef around 100 grams respectively. Moreover, minor fluctuations noticeable in eating habits of fish is around over 50 grams which remains constant and at last, it decreased in the intake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | baoquyen1906 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | baoquyen1906 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age group in UK who used the internet everyday from 2003 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparison where relevant 67
- The bar chart shows divorce rate in to european countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 73
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the honey bee Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...formal one was increased at the end and its the opposite lamb was decreased at 50 g...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, while, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70046082949 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42840090693 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552995391705 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2684460622 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805094353299 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431167605631 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483444982077 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068764906702 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547440513106 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.