The given line graph illustrates the changing patterns of the amount of fish and three types of meat consumed in a country in Europe from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, there was a mix of changing patterns with respect to the figures for the consumption of fish and three types of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Throughout the period, the number of the use of fish was constantly receiving the lowest figures. Noticeably, the statistics of chicken recorded the most significant growth among all categories.
At the beginning of the period, beef and lamb experienced the highest numbers with 220 and 150 grams, respectively. Throughout the 16-year period, the amounts of beef and lamb consumed dropped to approximately 100 and 50 grams, respectively. Fish consumption also decreased but much less significantly to just below 50.
Turning to the figures for chicken, it came in third place in 1979 with 140 grams. During the 25-year period, there was a sharp increase in the consumption of chicken to nearly 250 grams in 2004.
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 92
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place in the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterling 67
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm 61
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, third, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98850574713 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82581011409 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1297650158 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4444444444 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175799025954 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718365284221 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796318270278 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11345632017 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584057822511 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.