The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph depicts how consumer preference to fish and other types of meat change which surveyed in a European country extent from 1979 to 2004. Generally, despite having fluctuated constantly, it is clear that chicken consumption had the upward trend while beef, lamb and fish were on decrease progress with different accelerations.
According to the visual, it is worth noting that beef exceeded to be the most favorable option chosen by people with more than 200 grams consumed per capita in a week in the year of 1979. Meanwhile, there were around 150 grams of chicken and lamb eaten at the same time and fish marked the final place with just over 50 grams.
During the 1979-2004 period, per week the amount of chicken consumed by a person substantially climbed to rank first for approximately 250 grams. On the contrary, beef showed a significant shrink to about more than 100 grams eaten but still occupied the second place, followed by lamb and fish. Apparently, the lamb consumption's line expressed the considerable decline throughout past 25 years. Finally, fish still remained its position by mildly plunged to under 50 grams per capita per week.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, if, second, so, still, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0358974359 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62226345258 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7723838419 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135201456294 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588213428698 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530280284137 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983979059463 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659686148392 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.