Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working a for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, education chiefly focuses on social merit of students rather than in other scientific fields. Therefore, there is a widespread belief that high school curriculum should include some volunteer community service as a compulsory part. From my perspectives, this would definitely bring certain benefits to both children and society.
First and foremost, these programmes seize bigger opportunities for scholars to immense themselves in life experience. Activities such as running a charity, enhancing the neighbourhood or being a sport instructor require them to obtain leading and bonding skills as well as know how to host an event smoothly. This knowledge is not provided in theoretical classes and students have to undergo in person to reach these levels and become more mature. Furthermore, attending volunteer works gives chances to get exposure to more people and afterwards, it would boost their confidence to communicate and widen the relationships. It is apparent that some extra curriculum activities or field trips raise teenagers' awareness of their responsibilities towards society.
On the other hand, unpaid community service is an effective way to improve social welfare from the young resources. It is worth noting that the youngster nowadays have less care about the outside world and become more nonchalant with other people who need help. Unless these programmes are implemented, students will lose their sense of duty and the social bond will be exerted negative impacts, Some activities may be held in local extent but their influences would spread in the whole community.
Having manifested through the aforementioned opinions, the value of volunteer service is undoubtedly indispensable. They not only form students as social citizens but also greatly contribute to the development of the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | nhaxquyeen | 84 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive and negative development? 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63669064748 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00363158555 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654676258993 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9080169816 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189160893145 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557870157839 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622373893236 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969125821598 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472327752029 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.