The table below gives information about the languages that high school students speak at home in one school district in the USA.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied table illustrates the statistical figures regarding the linguistic options spoken after school by students in a school district in the United States in 2008 and 2014.
In the observation of the whole visual, Spanish dominantly made up a major proportion in the number of users and had no sign of decrease, similar to some others.
First of all, it is obvious that Spanish became the most favorable language preferred using by high school pupils and even doubled in its amount of users over the period given. Whereas, some of other languages, such as Chinese, Russian and Nepalese, mark a dramatic speed of rising from 2008 to 2014 by quadrupling or fivefold increasing. For instance, Chinese-spoken students significantly upsurged to 4670 while having started at 1875 in the time of six years. In addition, Hindi showed the mild growth by adding a few more.
On the other hand, a group of languages had the downward trend. Particularly, two South Asian-originated languages, namely Korean and Vietnamese, remarkably halved in the amount of high school students using in the year of 2014. Finally, at the same time, the Polish demonstrated a slight decline from 110 to 82 students.
In conclusion, given by the table is the information of how one school district's pupils showed the change of linguistic preference in the year of 2008 and 2014.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-02 | nhaxquyeen | 75 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive and negative development? 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working a for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11555555556 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91050375344 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608888888889 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3469722126 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3 5.23603664747 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190026484409 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659955668798 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664920525658 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108246019008 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069127534122 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.