The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meats in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the amount of four different types of food consumed by people in a European country over 25-year period.
It is clear that more and more people consumed chicken, while the figures for beef, lamb and fish experienced a decrease. In addition, fish was the least eatten food.
In 1979, the figure for fish was the lowest, each person just ate 60 grams per week. By constrast, beef was the most consumed food, at about 220 grams per week, the figures for chicken and lamb were much lower, at around 140 grams and 150 grams respectively.
The consumption of beef, lamb and fish shared a similar trend. While the figures for lamb and chicken saw a significant decrease, at around 50 grams and 110 grams per week in 2004; the consumption of chicken rose dramatically from 140 grams to approximately 250 grams. Fish remained the lowest consumption, just about 40 grams per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-29 | phatnguyen1841999 | 56 | view |
- Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- In the developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers a 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meats in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8164556962 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52626802287 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569620253165 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0183707177 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0915852517662 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530092481103 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397680119832 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0691031903804 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424919966556 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.