The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1989 to 2007.
The line chart conveys the number of several spreads consumption from 1981 to 2007, counted in grams.
In general, the number of all spread consumption underwent a downward trend. It is also worth pointing out that margarine and butter were consumed more initially before low fat & reduced spread became more preferable options over the year.
From 1981 to 1996, the consumption of butter surged considerably by more than double after reaching its peak at 160 grams. Whilst, an upward trend as shown in the consumption of margarine for 20 before staying at the same number at 100, surpassing the butter intake. Also, the low fat & reduced spread was the lowest at the end of the period.
In the following eleven years, a gradual decline was shown by butter by more than 20. While the consumption of low fat & reduced spread skyrocketed before dipping slightly at below 80, the number of margarine consumption surged by more than half, becoming the least consumed spread eventually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their poorer countries to work in developed countries What problem does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 56
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0736196319 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59199304177 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8717947547 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.375 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194885938506 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979075957146 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778237872947 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14532206272 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590771550041 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.