The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The graph illustrates, the contrast of wheat which is exchanged from Australia, Canada and community of Europe between 1985 and 1990.
Overall, European community is showing an upward trend, Canada export is fluctuating and Australia had experienced a downward trend.
In 1985, Australia exported 15millions of tons of wheat the next chasing year the quantity of wheat increased which was about 16million of tones. However, in the next four years (1987-1990) there was a steady decrease and got stable on approximately 11millons of tones. In the meanwhile, the amount of Canadian wheat export was almost 18millions of tons, reached at the peak level in 1990 which was more or less than 24millions. The succeeding year, it showed a decrease dramatically which was 14millions tones while in 1990 it climbed back roughly to 19millon tones. 17millionss of tones were exported from European community in 1985 but it decreases to 14 million tons in 1995. The amount of export was rocketed in 1989 and 1990 which was round about 21 millions of tones.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-02 Hanabi view
2022-03-16 ngochuyen view
2021-05-30 bachduong123 11 view
2020-07-03 tomleung1996 61 view
2020-07-03 tomleung1996 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '21 million'.
Suggestion: 21 million
... in 1989 and 1990 which was round about 21 millions of tones.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while, more or less

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11695906433 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74325733856 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.7616630393 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0795625011645 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407172038251 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229370897207 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583855484906 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00321623417419 0.0819641961636 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.