The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

The bar graph compares the four different modes of transport took by European citizens in three stages of the year; 1960, 1980 and 2000.

According to the graph, the preferences of transport have changed within 40 years except for tube. In general, majority of people had chosen to use a bus in 1960, which number moved to the use of cars by 2000.

It can be clearly seen that the lowest rates of modes of transports are recorded in Train and Tube. The percentage of train fluctuated from almost 20% in 1960 to above 20% in 2000, while the proportion of tube showed a decline trend from approximately 27% to 25% within projected periods.

Almost a quarter of European took the bus instead of cars in 1960 as the percentage of the usage of car recorded at the lowest of around 7%. While between 1980 and 2000, there was a dramatic decline of more than half (to reach at 15% in 2000) in the percentage of bus usage by people in Europe, there was a significant increase in the car usage to reach at a peak of more than 35% by 2000.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-13 Raksha rai 73 view
2018-09-02 Tracyphi 61 view
2018-09-03 Tracyphi 56 view
2017-10-10 mahabub 50 view
2019-06-11 Mishika sugandhi 78 view
Essays by user YS89 :

Comments

four different modes of transport took by European citizens
four different modes of transport taken by European citizens

majority of people had chosen to use a bus in 1960, which number moved to the use of cars by 2000.
majority of people had chosen to use a bus in 1960, while the number moved to the use of cars by 2000.

flaws:
why you think so:
the preferences of transport have changed within 40 years except for tube?

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 192 200
No. of Characters: 810 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.722 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.219 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.416 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 47 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 32 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.445 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.444 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.76 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4