The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

The bar graph gives information about the percentage of commuters used to travel and work by train, car, tube, bus in European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.
As can be seen from the chart, while the proportion of commuter who travel by car was highest in four transportation, others commuted by bus was the most popular in 1960 and minority of people who commuted by train and tube was lower than four type transportation during the period shown.
It can be clearly seen that commuters by train fluctuated from nearly 20% in 1960 to above 25% in 2000 while tube of transport showed a decline trend from approximately 27% to 25% within projected periods.
In contrast, the proportion of car increased significantly from over 5% in 1960 to approximately 37% in 2000. However, bus transportation in European city, there was a significant decrease from nearly 40% in 1960 to 15% over 40 years.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90389726552 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584415584416 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.8364095243 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.4 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287866169959 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170004131651 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946279364352 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18930425723 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100496748678 0.0819641961636 123% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.