The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The bar chart given compares a city located un Europe in terms of which types of transport the local inhabitants used to commute to work over a period of 40 years from 1960 to 2000.
It is clear from the chart that residents were prone to go to work by cars and buses. Additionally, an oscillated trend was the norm in all categories except fot the figures of car and bus.
In 1960, the proportion of bus accounted for nearly 40% of the total, which became the most widely-preferred kind of transport used to commute to workplaces among local citizens, while the shares of tube and train were dwarfed by that of bus, at approximately 27% and 18% in turn. Conversely, only over 5% of the locals decided to utilise car to go to work.
In 1980, city's inhabitants were gradually keen on commuting to work by car, with nearly 23%, at which point the share of this transport rocketed to 37% in 2000. Meanwhile, after having plummeted to over 25% in 1980, the rate of bus carried on undergoing a substantial drop to exactly 15% in 2000. By contrast, there was a gradual growth in the percentage of train passengers to about 27%, compared to a slow decrease in that of tube to around 20%. To 2000, a slight rebounce was recorded in the proportion of tube to exactly 25%, whereas that of train commuters dipped moderately to approximately 25%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-09 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | Gagandeep adiwal | 67 | view |
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 61
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges 73
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to utilise car to go to work. In 1980, citys inhabitants were gradually keen on...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 33.7804878049 195% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57676348548 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72537993757 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7839740267 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144290447358 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595314667267 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517613412557 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937609001077 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447436969425 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.