The graph below show that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012.
The graph given compares Australia in terms of the amount of cargo exported to four distinct nations over a period of 22 years from 1990 to 2012.
It is evident from the graph that during the research period, China and Japan were by far the two most appealing export markets of Australia. Addtionally, an oscillating trend was the norm in all categories except for the rate of China.
In 1990, the share of goods exported to Japan constituted approximately 25% of the total, which made it become the most potential export market in that year. Likewise, the figure for the USA was nearly 2 times as low as that of Japan, at 10%, compared to only 3% and 2% of cargo purchased by China and India in turn.
To 2010, Australian manufacturers were fond of exporting goods to China, with over 25% of the total, at which point it started to slacken to about 28% and remained the peak of the graph. Meanwhile, this nation witnessed insignificant dips to above 16% and 15 % in the percentage of Japan in 2010 and 2012 respectively. Conversely, after having undergone a minimal growth to approximately 8% in 2010, the proportion of China began to drop steadily to 6% in 2012, accompanied by a marginal decline to 7% recorded in the figure for the US.
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 84
- The percentage of 3 types of crimes car theft house burglary street robbery in England Wales from 1970 to 2015 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below show that the percentage of Australian export to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61990950226 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73642994788 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601809954751 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.2707510131 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222889953701 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924569210722 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739695643001 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138643009816 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587753120515 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.