The line graph illustrates the 3 sources of total air pollutants in Britain during a 15 year period since 1990.
Overall, as can be seen from the chart, the total amount of air pollutant experienced a significant decline and industry was the factor that saw a sharp fell among the three surveyed. Units are measured in million tonnes.
In 1990, the total amount of air pollutants in the UK was 7 billion tonnes, then it decreased considerately to 4 billion tonnes in 1999. The figure continued to experience a slight fell of merely 2 million tonnes in the next 3 years before reaching its lowest point at just above 3 billion tonnes in the end.
Industry accounted for the highest number of air pollutants, at around 5 billion tonnes in 1990. Then, there was a downward trend throughout the period surveyed to 2 billion tonnes in 2005, with a particularly sharp fall in the middle years, from 1993 to 1999. On the contrary, transport and households generally produced fewer air pollutants than the former. Air pollutants from transport remained so throughout the period at approximately 1 billion tonnes, whereas the figure for households witnessed a slight decrease from around 1 billion tonnes in 1990 to just above 0.1 billion tonnes by 2005.
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries. 56
- Topic: Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
- The chart below shows how frequency people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...e three surveyed. Units are measured in million tonnes. In 1990, the total amount of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92924528302 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76350288623 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0068337982 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.111111111 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160375023679 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761022783252 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530694627807 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11006894465 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439721174936 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.