The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The line graph compares the amount of electricity in France over a period of 32 years (1980-2012).

Overall, electricity production from nuclear power was highest, while the amount of electricity from renewable energy was lowest during the period shown.

In 1980, about 120 terawatt hours of electricity was produced from thermal power. In the same year, nuclear and hydroelectric stations produced around 75 terawatt hours of electricity each. Renewable energy provided a negligible amount. One year later, nuclear energy overtook thermal energy as the primary source of electricity.

From 1980 to 2005, electricity production from nuclear power increased constantly and reached a peak of some 430 terawatt hours. By contrast, the figure of thermal energy declined to only 50 terawatt hours in 1985 and remained almost unchanged for the rest of period. The production of electricity from hydroelectric power stayed relatively stable at around 50 terawatt hours and 80 terawatt hours, over the whole 32-year period. The amount of electricity from renewable energy rose slightly during the last seven years.

Votes
Average: 8 (6 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55294117647 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78065487296 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7899393311 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173878945743 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841002004076 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595573276436 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127114318915 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427189334054 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.