The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparison where relevant.
A glance at the graph compares the amount of electricity produced by four different power sources in France from 1980 to 2012.
Overview, it is evident that nuclear power was by far the most important energy source in France. In comparison, renewables remained the less productive energy over the same period.
Being the main supplier of power in 1980, the thermal power stations produced in the vinicity of 120 TW-h of electricity. Meanwhile, the hydroelectric and nuclear power were generated at the same amount of energy which was approximately 70 TW-h. In contrast, renewables contributed only a trivial amount to the national grid. One year later, there was a switch to nuclear power as the primary source of electricity.
Between 1982 and 2005, there was a drammatical rise in the amount of energy produced by nuclear power which reached its peak of 430 TW-h. Conversely, the figure of thermal power fell to only 50 TW-h in 1985 and remained at this level for the rest of the period. Hydroelectric power stations maintained its power generation which was average 70 TW-h per year but renewable electricity production saw only an marginal rise to approximately 25 TW-h by 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | view | |
| 2018-07-22 | htboutique | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-29 | Rashmeet Kaur | 100 | view |
| 2019-01-11 | Joker975 | 78 | view |
- the chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries 73
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 63
- the chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries. 73
- The chart below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of energy which was approximately 70 TW-h. In contrast, renewables contrib...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nuclear power which reached its peak of 430 TW-h. Conversely, the figure of ther...
^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...newable electricity production saw only an marginal rise to approximately 25 TW-h ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06091370558 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84808217192 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522842639594 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6727011794 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810414539565 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388484883609 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503191046963 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710983304832 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530508661582 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.