The graph below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.

The bar chart indicates the number of inmates in five different countries from 1930 to 1980.

Overall, an upward trend was observed in the figure of Great Britain and United State (US). By contrast, other three countries including Australia, New Zealand and Canada witnessed a downward trend in the figures for imprisonment. In particular, the figure in US fluctuated widely before reaching the highest point of the bar chart in 1940.

As regard the first, it was 30,000 and 100,000 prisoners in Great Britain and US in 1930, respectively. The former had a steadily increase in figure over 50 years, with an estimated 80,000 prisoners in 1980. Meanwhile, the later fluctuated widely by about 40,000 prisoners and became the highest number of prison country in 1980.

In other way, the number of inmates in Canada witnessed a gradually decrease from 120,000 prisoners in 1930 to 80,000 prisoners in 1970, excepting 1950 increased slightly to nearly 120,000 prisoners. At the end, the figure rose modestly to approximately 85,000 prisoners in 1980. In Australia and New Zealand, the figures were respectively 70,000 and 100,000 prisoners. They declined steadily between 1930 and 1950 but elevated slightly over 20 years, with 60,000 prisoners for each country. While the figure in Australia decreased to 50,000 prisoners, it was an increase to 80,000 prisoners in New Zealand.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-12 phuongnguyen1234 67 view
2022-05-29 Dhvani Bhanushali 62 view
2022-05-29 Dhvani Bhanushali 67 view
2021-12-12 vanditaverma.v@gmail.com 56 view
2021-12-11 lapkhanh view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...S in 1930, respectively. The former had a steadily increase in figure over 50 years, with an estima...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...e number of inmates in Canada witnessed a gradually decrease from 120,000 prisoners in 1930 to 80,00...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26244343891 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73839783641 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.438006213 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9166666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175872471123 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830258928068 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545909638591 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138203972948 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506098770965 0.0819641961636 62% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.