The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line chart depicts the different types of activities which grey-haired people have done in their spare time, covering a period from 1980 to 2010.

Overall, it can see that hiking is the event which liked by most of the older adults and its popularity increased with time while older people were less interested in theater.

To begin with surfing the internet which was least popular in first 20 years amounting in between 5% to 15%. The ratio suddenly increased in the last decade and touched its highest point recorded as 50%. The next activity was at the theater. 50% of older people spend their free time in the theater in 1980, but it dwindled by 20% after a decade before rose to about 45% last year.

Furthermore with the rest of the activities, older people took more interest in reading rather than hiking in 1980 amounting to 30% and 20% respectively but an equal proportion of people recorded in the 1990s. After that people’s ratio who were interested in reading decreased by 20% while hiking percentage inclined by 20% after a decade. 60% older adults spend their leisure time in reading, but hiking ratio touched its peak point in the last year. Watching TV was all-time famous activity recorded 60% in the begging, which was increased to 70% in 2000 but declined by 5% in last year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... before rose to about 45% last year. Furthermore with the rest of the activities, older ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75438596491 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37652933055 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530701754386 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2018099177 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114254605644 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492939004591 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444417962188 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0813669961749 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303446485445 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.